In 2007,
I attended a keynote address, Lester Laminack was the speaker, at the TCRWP
August Writing Institute and was doing some fall cleaning and re-reading some
notes. It was the first time I ever heard Lester speak, and I must admit
that, even now that I have heard him on several occasions throughout the years,
I still feel like the kids (and teachers) are fortunate to have such a gifted
orator and author in their midst. I think it is powerful to revisit notes
from several years ago and see what advice still holds true in these changing
times, what gems we might have forgotten over the passage of time, and how
thinking has evolved from that point.
Lester began
with sharing that in "all forms of art; simplicity is elegance".
There is an inherent danger when we focus on craft in isolation -
students tend to over generalize. This is not surprising, in that,
Brian Cambourne, the renowned Australian educational researcher, explained that
approximation is one of the principles of learning. It's that place where
we're not quite sure if we've got it right, but because it's new and we're
excited about what we are learning, we tend to overuse it.
Lester went on
to encourage teachers to “bathe children in the language of the things we hope
that they will write.” How often do we do this? How often do we invite children
to write just like (name the author)? In the 1980’s, during the
whole language movement, teachers often made the mistake of drowning kids
versus immersing them in language. Here is where we fell into the
trap of just teaching kids HOW to do it, and often neglected the more important
WHEN and WHY of using it in our writing.
Lester
explained, that “technique should serve the writer’s intention.” Encourage
writers to form theories about WHY the writer applied the craft to that
particular place. What effect was it intended to have on the
reader? I think that when I enter classrooms where writers are
having trouble find the heart of their stories, it is often because they're
unsure about their intention.
We need to
make sure that, first and foremost, writers recognize that our
classrooms, our schools and our communities are places where their stories
matter. An all important question to guide our conferring is: Why
are you writing this PARTICULAR piece? Who do you hope will read it? What are
you trying to show/say?
According to
Lester, “the teaching of and application of craft should be designed to
fine-tune the writer’s intentions so that their readers are able to interpret
the author’s meaning. Authors are intentional and deliberate about their craft
decisions in a text, we can teach our writers to approach their writing with
the same stance, and when rehearsing, choosing, developing, drafting, revising
and editing it’s all about making the meaning clearer – it’s all about
intention. How do you approach the teaching of craft? I think it’s an important
question – in that – the CCLS seem to highlight structure, organization and
elaboration? What about craft? Do we still feel like it has a place in our
teaching? To learn more about Lester's books and advice for writers, teachers and schools, visit the following website: http://www.lesterlaminack.com/index.htm
Love the title of this post! I've heard Lester say this before too. It is is a fine line. We must teach kids not to overuse craft because, well, you know.
ReplyDelete